Legal Opinion

Schettino v. Labarba

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 13, 2004No. AC 24037PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DiPENTIMA, J.

In this personal injury action, the substitute defendant, Michael Maronich,1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court setting aside the jury’s verdict and ordering anew trial on the issue of damages, rendered following the defendant’s refusal to accept the court-ordered additur. On appeal,2 the defendant claims that the court improperly granted the additur when there was no indication that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence or was otherwise based on prejudice. We agree with the defendant and, therefore, reverse the judgment and remand the case to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ford v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  2. Childs v. BainerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  3. Wichers v. HatchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  4. Weiss v. BergenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  5. Wallace v. HaddockConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Fileccia v. Nationwide Property & Casualty InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  2. Hughes v. LamayConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  3. Turner v. PascarelliConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  4. Smith v. LefebreConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  5. Greci v. ParksConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API