Legal Opinion

Snell v. Beamon

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 23, 2004No. AC 24027PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McLACHLAN, J.

In this personal injury action, the defendants, Natasha Beamon and John R. Brown, appeal from the judgment of the trial court setting aside the jury’s verdict and ordering a new trial on the issue of damages that was rendered following their refusal to accept a court-ordered additur. On appeal, the defendants claim that the court improperly granted the addi-tur because the juiy verdict was adequate as a matter of law. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

*143This appeal arises out of a negligence action brought by the plaintiff, Denise Snell, against the defendants for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Childs v. BainerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. Robinson v. BackesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1917
  3. Marchetti v. RamirezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  4. Gladu v. SousaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  5. Parasco v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Smith v. LefebreConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  2. Lombardi v. CobbConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  3. DeEsso v. LitzieConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
  4. Silva v. Walgreen Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  5. Maldonado v. FlannerySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API