Legal Opinion
City National Bank v. Davis
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 27, 1980PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Per curiam
This case arises ont of prejudgment orders of attachment and garnishment which the garnishee seeks to vacate on the ground that the defendant in the underlying actions has no legal interest in the property attached. The prejudgment remedies of attachment were ordered, after a hearing in 1976, in conjunction with two actions to enforce the indebtedness of the defendant Cynthia R. Davis and others1 on retail instalment contracts which obligated them to pay certain sums to the plaintiff, the City National Bank of Connecticut. Various unsuccessful efforts were made by and on behalf of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- E. J. Hansen Elevator, Inc. v. StollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- State v. RobersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- State v. BellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- State v. AshermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Kukanskis v. GriffithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ambroise v. William Raveis Real Estate, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- McCutcheon & Burr, Inc. v. BermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Babiarz v. Hartford Special, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1984
- Plasil v. TablemanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Dunham v. DunhamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.