Legal Opinion

Kukanskis v. Griffith

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 13, 1980PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBogdanski, J.

On May 4,1979, the parties entered into an agreement wherein the defendant agreed to construct a house for-the plaintiffs on land owned by the defendant, designated as “Lot #2.” On June 26, 1979, the plaintiffs, claiming that the defendant had breached the contract, brought an action for specific performance and money damages. Thereafter upon application by the plaintiffs, the court granted an ex parte prejudgment remedy of attachment of the defendant’s interest in a parcel of land referred to as “Lot #4.” The plaintiffs also filed a notice of lis pendens on Lot #2. On July 2, 1979, the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Mitchell v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Pet v. Department of Health ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. LaCroix v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  3. Chrysler Corporation v. Fedders Corporation, Salvatore Giordano, Sr., Salvatore Giordano, Jr., Bruno Giordano, Ignatius MacBrinn and Howard S. ModlinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  4. Williams v. BartlettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  5. Shelby Mutual Insurance v. GhelfaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API