Legal Opinion
Babiarz v. Hartford Special, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 10, 1984No. (2595)PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
The plaintiffs are ninety-six employees of the defendant, Hartford Special, Inc., 1 who are either retired or eligible to retire. The defendant adopted a plan of complete liquidation under which certain retirement benefits, consisting of life and health insurance coverage, would be terminated. The plaintiffs sued to enjoin the termination of those benefits and for damages, and obtained an ex parte attachment of real estate of the defendant in the amount of $1,000,000. Thereafter, the plaintiffs moved, pursuant to General Statutes § 52-278k, 2 to increase the amount of the attachment to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Three S. Development Co. v. SantoreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Augeri v. C. F. Wooding Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- American Oil Co. v. ValentiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. KramarskyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Solomon v. AbermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Bank of Boston Connecticut v. SchlesingerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- New England Land Co. v. DeMarkeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- McCutcheon & Burr, Inc. v. BermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- State v. SwintonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.