Legal Opinion
United States v. East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Kentucky
Decided March 29, 2007No. Civ.A. 04-34-KSFPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
FORESTER, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the plaintiffs first motion for summary judgment [DE # 61] regarding the applicable legal test for the routine maintenance, repair, and replacement exclusion. In this motion, the parties ask the Court to determine whether the “routine maintenance, repair, and replacement” exclusions found in the Clean Air Act should be applied to activities that are considered “routine at the unit” or “routine in the industry.” 1
I. REGULATORY BACKGROUND AND FRAMEWORK
The plaintiff United States (referred to herein as the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Alabama Power Co.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2008
- United States v. Duke Energy Corp.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2014
- National Parks Conservation Ass'n v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2009