United States v. Duke Energy Corp.
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
OSTEEN, JR., District Judge.
Currently pending and ripe for ruling is Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment on All Remaining Claims (the “Plant Modernization Program” Claims). (Doc. 434.) For the reasons set out below, this court will grant the motion in part and deny it in part.
I. STANDARD OF REVIEW
Summary judgment should be granted if, even taking all the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, Zakodnick v. Int’l Bus. Machs. Corp., 135 F.3d 911, 913 (4th Cir.1997), “the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Environmental Defense v. Duke Energy CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- George Zahodnick v. International Business MacHines Corporation Lockheed Martin Federal Systems, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- Wisconsin Electric Power Company v. William K. Reilly, Administrator and United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. Coffeyville Resources RefiningDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2022