Legal Opinion
United States v. Alabama Power Co.
District Court, N.D. Alabama
Decided July 24, 2008No. 4:01-cr-00152PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON ALABAMA POWER COMPANY’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON “RMRR ”
(Routine Maintenance and Repair)
VIRGINIA EMERSON HOPKINS, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the renewed motion of the defendant, Alabama Power Company (“APC”) for summary judgment. (Doc. 193). APC asks this court to find that the applicable legal test for the “routine maintenance repair, and replacement” exclusions found in the Clean Air Act should be applied to activities that are considered “routine in the industry,” rather than “routine at the unit.”
I. BACKGROUND
On June 28, 2004,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Morton v. RuizSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- National Parks Conservation Ass'n v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2009