Legal Opinion
Madrid v. Robinson
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided February 13, 1997No. CC 92C-11138; 92C-11696; CA A84207; SC S43277PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.
Plaintiff, as guardian ad litem for Kenneth Madrid (Madrid), brought this personal injury action to recover damages sustained when Madrid was struck by a car operated by defendant. Plaintiff also brought an action on her own behalf for loss of consortium. The cases were consolidated for trial. The jury returned a verdict for defendant, and judgment was entered accordingly. The Court of Appeals reversed, holding that the trial court erred in allowing defendant’s expert witnesses to testify about what “caused” the accident. Madrid v. Robinson, 138 Or App 130, 134, 906 P2d 855 (1995). For the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. MiddletonOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Yundt v. D & D BOWL, INC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. StringerOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Tiedemann v. Radiation Therapy ConsultantsOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- French v. BarrettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. GherasimOregon Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. NicholsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- State v. WoodfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- State v. RossiterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- State v. McAdooCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026