Legal Opinion

French v. Barrett

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 25, 1987No. 16-83-08882; CA A35210PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.

This is an action to recover damages for injuries which plaintiff sustained when she was struck by a car driven by defendant Patrick Barrett and registered to defendants Louis and Patricia Linton. Plaintiff sued Barrett for the negligent operation of an automobile and sought to hold the Lin-tons liable under the family purpose doctrine. The trial court dismissed the claims against the Lintons and their daughter, Tamera Ann Barrett. The jury found that plaintiff and defendant Barrett were equally at fault in causing the accident, and the court entered a judgment accordingly. On appeal,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. MiddletonOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Herman v. MagnusonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Rickard v. EllisOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Kraxberger v. RogersOregon Supreme Court · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Stucker v. ChitwoodMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Madrid v. RobinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. DeRosa v. KolbCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  4. Madrid v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  5. Zacher v. PettyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API