Legal Opinion

State v. Gherasim

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1999No. CC C951646CR; CA A94556; SC S45379PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeeson, J.

The issue in this criminal case is whether the trial court erred by not allowing defendant’s expert witness to testify that the victim suffered from dissociative amnesia. The Court of Appeals held that the trial court erred and reversed and remanded the case for a new trial. State v. Gherasim, 153 Or App 313, 956 P2d 1054 (1998). We affirm.

Defendant was charged with first-degree kidnaping, ORS 163.235; attempted first-degree rape, ORS 161.405 and ORS 163.375; first-degree sex abuse, ORS 163.427; fourth-degree assault, ORS 163.160; and menacing, ORS 163.190. It is uncontested that the victim…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. MiddletonOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Yundt v. D & D BOWL, INC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1971
  3. State v. StringerOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. MunroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  5. Madrid v. RobinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. JesseOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. AkinsOregon Supreme Court · 2025
  3. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  4. State v. Mendoza-SanchezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  5. State v. DyeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API