Legal Opinion

State v. Stringer

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1982No. 79-6-323, CA 16904, SC 27482PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*390DENECKE, C. J.

In our initial opinion in this case we held the trial court did not err in refusing to permit an expert called by the defendant to testify to his opinion where the victim was located when she was struck by the defendant. 291 Or 527, 633 P2d 770 (1981). We so held because a diagram relied upon by the expert in reaching his opinion was not in evidence and, therefore, was not considered by the jury. The defendant filed a petition for rehearing contending that the diagram was in evidence. The state filed no response to the petition.

In considering the petition, we re-examined the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Myers v. Cessna Aircraft CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Yundt v. D & D BOWL, INC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Thomas v. DAD'S ROOT BEER, ETC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Marshall v. MartinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Bailey v. Rhodes, Adm.Oregon Supreme Court · 1954

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. State v. MiddletonOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. RogersOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. NefstadOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. BlackOregon Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Wilson v. BF GoodrichOregon Supreme Court · 1982

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API