Legal Opinion
United States v. Field
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided November 17, 1994No. Crim. 4-94-41(1), 4-94-41(2)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DOTY, District Judge.
Defendants Clark Beach Field and Richard Field appeal the order entered by United States Magistrate Judge Floyd E. Boline, dated August 1, 1994. The Fields moved to vacate or amend the ex parte restraining order issued by Chief Judge Diana E. Murphy upon return of the original indictment. The motion to vacate was denied by Magistrate Judge Boline’s order.
The original indictment was filed on March 23, 1994, and contained 15 criminal counts and three forfeiture counts. 1 The indictment is based on allegations that defendants Clark and Richard Field along with others…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Alexander v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. MonsantoSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. NaftalinSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Juri Ripinsky, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. FieldCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. MillerDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1998
- United States v. JewellDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2008
- United States v. QueriDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2010
- United States v. Clark Beach Field, United States of America v. Richard Field, Also Known as Mike Field, United States of America v. Clark Beach Field, United States of America v. Richard Field, Also Known as Mike FieldCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.