Legal Opinion
United States v. Juri Ripinsky, (Two Cases)
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 30, 1994No. 93-50369, 93-50654PublishedCited by 76 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
Juri Ripinsky appeals two separate district court orders, the first issued May 21, 1993, converting an ex parte restraining order into a preliminary injunction, the second issued August 11, 1993, converting a second ex parte restraining order into a preliminary injunction. Each restraint is pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853 but involves assets different from the other. As to each, Ripinsky argues that the government may not subject substitute assets to pretrial restraint and that the district court improperly relied solely on the indictment and hearsay evidence at the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Alexander v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. MonsantoSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Sample v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Richard A. GinsburgCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- United States v. John VoigtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- United States v. SarkisianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Joseph A. Kirschenbaum, A/K/A Ari Kirschenbaum, Appeal Of: Julie KirschenbaumCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- United States v. BornfieldCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. JarvisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.