Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Jewell

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided March 6, 2008No. 4:07CR00103 JLH, 4:07CV00451 JLHPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

J. LEON HOLMES, District Judge.

This Opinion and Order is entered in two companion cases, one of which is a criminal case brought by the United States against Barry Jewell seeking, among other things, forfeiture of funds from three retirement accounts, and the other of which is a civil forfeiture case regarding the same funds. In the criminal case, the government sought and obtained a protective order providing that the funds, which were previously seized and placed in the Treasury Suspense Fund, should remain in the Treasury Suspense Fund until this matter is concluded.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. James Daniel Good Real PropertySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kirby Forest Industries, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Guidry v. Sheet Metal Workers National Pension FundSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. United States v. RegisterCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
  5. United States v. Shirley A. Jones, Mega-Universal Oxygen and Home Care Services, Inc., National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. WoffordCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. JewellDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2008
  3. United States v. HerrmannDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API