Legal Opinion

United States v. Naftalin

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 21, 1979No. 78-561PublishedCited by 325 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brennan

The question presented in this case is whether § 17 (a)(1) of the Securities Act of 1933, 48 Stat. 84, as amended, 68 Stat. 686, 15 U. S. C. § 77q (a)(1), prohibits frauds against brokers as well as investors. We hold that it does.

Respondent, Neil Naftalin, was the president of a registered broker-dealer firm and a professional investor. Between July and August 1969, Naftalin engaged in a “short selling” scheme. He selected stocks that, in his judgment, had peaked in price and were entering into a period of market decline. He then placed with five brokers orders to sell shares of these…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Superintendent of Insurance of New York v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Capital Gains Research Bureau, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Securities & Exchange Commission v. National Securities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by325 opinions

  1. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. United States v. BatchelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Gustafson v. Alloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995

320 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API