United States v. Naftalin
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brennan
The question presented in this case is whether § 17 (a)(1) of the Securities Act of 1933, 48 Stat. 84, as amended, 68 Stat. 686, 15 U. S. C. § 77q (a)(1), prohibits frauds against brokers as well as investors. We hold that it does.
Respondent, Neil Naftalin, was the president of a registered broker-dealer firm and a professional investor. Between July and August 1969, Naftalin engaged in a “short selling” scheme. He selected stocks that, in his judgment, had peaked in price and were entering into a period of market decline. He then placed with five brokers orders to sell shares of these…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Superintendent of Insurance of New York v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Capital Gains Research Bureau, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. National Securities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by325 opinions
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. BatchelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Gustafson v. Alloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
320 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.