Legal Opinion

Boyd v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 5, 1949No. 17PublishedCited by 139 opinions

1Per curiam

In issue here is the validity of a contract restricting the choice of venue for an action based upon the Federal Employers’ Liability Act. Petitioner was injured in the course of his duties as an employee of respondent railroad in November, 1946. Twice during the following month petitioner was advanced fifty dollars by respondent. On each of these occasions petitioner signed an agreement stipulating that if his claim could not be settled and he elected to sue, “such suit shall be commenced within the county or district where I resided at the time my injuries were sustained or in the county or…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ex Parte CollettSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Callen v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Duncan v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Krenger v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
  5. Clark v. LowdenDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1942

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by139 opinions

  1. The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Bisso v. Inland Waterways Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. United States v. Allegheny-Ludlum Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  5. Harrington v. Atlantic Sounding Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010

134 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API