Legal Opinion
United States v. Allegheny-Ludlum Industries, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided August 18, 1975No. 74-3056PublishedCited by 190 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THORNBERRY, Circuit Judge:
These appeals present novel and important issues which require us to consider the scope of the federal government’s authority to encourage and negotiate expeditious and efficient settlement *834of widespead charges of employment discrimination in the nation’s steel industry. Some of these issues are procedural in nature; others call into question the substantive legality of the means utilized. Some issues are ripe for decision; others are essentially hypothetical and conjectural. During the interim between the oral argument of these appeals in December, 1974 and the…
2Cases cited118 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by190 opinions
- Cotton v. HintonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- 29 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1473, 30 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 33,064 the Officers for Justice, and Jesse J. Byrd v. The Civil Service Commission of the City and County of San Francisco, United States of America v. The City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Rush PETTWAY Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. AMERICAN CAST IRON PIPE COMPANY, a Corporation, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Williams v. VukovichCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. City of MiamiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
185 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.