Legal Opinion

Duncan v. Thompson

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 12, 1942No. 78PublishedCited by 100 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Black

April 10, 1936, petitioner Duncan, while performing duties as respondent’s employee, fell from a locomotive and was injured. Since at the time he was working for a “common carrier by railroad” and in interstate commerce, the right to recover damages is governed by the Federal Employers’ Liability Act. 35 Stat. 65. Sixteen months later, August 13, 1937, Duncan was still suffering from his injuries, his wife was in the hospital, and he needed money. On that day, upon Duncan’s signing an instrument presented to him by the company’s claim agent, he was paid $600 “for living and other expenses…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. The Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Philadelphia, Baltimore & Washington Railroad v. SchubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Lindsay v. Acme Cement Plaster Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Ballinger v. Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1916
  5. Carlson v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by100 opinions

  1. Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'NeilSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Garrett v. Moore-McCormack Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Dice v. Akron, Canton & Youngstown RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Garrett v. Moore-Mccormack Co., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Bisso v. Inland Waterways Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955

95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API