Legal Opinion

Bisso v. Inland Waterways Corp.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 16, 1955No. 50PublishedCited by 257 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Black

The question presented is whether a towboat may validly contract against all liability for its own negligent towage. Since there is no controlling statute the question must be decided as a part of the judicially created admiralty law. Federal courts have disagreed as to whether *86there is or should be a judicial rule invalidating such contracts. Calling attention to this uncertainty, the District Court, sitting in admiralty, sustained a contractual provision exempting respondent towboat owner from liability for negligence and entered judgment accordingly. 114 F. Supp. 713. The Court of Appeals…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Cooley v. Board of Wardens of Port of Philadelphia Ex Rel. Soc. for Relief of Distressed PilotsSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
  2. Liverpool & Great Western Steam Co. v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Railroad Co. v. LockwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  4. Kotch v. Board of River Port Pilot Comm'rs for Port of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. The ChinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1869

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by257 opinions

  1. The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. SeckingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Tunkl v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Southwestern Sugar & Molasses Co. v. River Terminals Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Entergy Mississippi, Inc. v. Burdette Gin Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1998

252 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API