Bisso v. Inland Waterways Corp.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Black
The question presented is whether a towboat may validly contract against all liability for its own negligent towage. Since there is no controlling statute the question must be decided as a part of the judicially created admiralty law. Federal courts have disagreed as to whether *86there is or should be a judicial rule invalidating such contracts. Calling attention to this uncertainty, the District Court, sitting in admiralty, sustained a contractual provision exempting respondent towboat owner from liability for negligence and entered judgment accordingly. 114 F. Supp. 713. The Court of Appeals…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Cooley v. Board of Wardens of Port of Philadelphia Ex Rel. Soc. for Relief of Distressed PilotsSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- Liverpool & Great Western Steam Co. v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Railroad Co. v. LockwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Kotch v. Board of River Port Pilot Comm'rs for Port of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- The ChinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by257 opinions
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. SeckingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Tunkl v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Southwestern Sugar & Molasses Co. v. River Terminals Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Entergy Mississippi, Inc. v. Burdette Gin Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1998
252 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.