Legal Opinion

Callen v. Pennsylvania Railroad

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 19, 1948No. 331PublishedCited by 242 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jackson

Plaintiff, a railroad brakeman, brought this action under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 35 Stat. 65; 53 Stat. 1404; 45 U. S. C. § 51. He recovered a jury verdict of $24,990, but the Circuit Court of Appeals reversed because of errors in the charge by the District Judge and ordered a new trial. The plaintiff’s claim as submitted to the jury was negligence on the part of an engineer in effecting a coupling operation at a speed which plaintiff thought would jolt him off the stirrup of the car he was riding. In jumping for safety, he claimed to have received a severe and permanent back…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ricketts v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946

3Cited by242 opinions

  1. Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Dice v. Akron, Canton & Youngstown RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. United States v. Allegheny-Ludlum Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  4. Omega Engineering, Inc. v. Omega, S.A., Docket No. 04-5084-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  5. Wayne B. Harris v. Department of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998

237 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API