Ex Parte Collett
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Vinson
In this case we must, decide whether the venue provisions of the Judicial Code1 render applicable the doctrine of jorum non conveniens to actions under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act.2 Petitioner instituted such an action against the Louisville and Nashville Railroad in October, 1947, in the court below, the United States District Court for . the Eastern District of Illinois. No trial was had before September 1, 1948, the effective date of the present Judicial Code.3 Thereafter the Railroad filed a motion to transfer the case to the District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky.
The…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Packard Motor Car Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Ex Parte FaheySupreme Court of the United States · 1947
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by505 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Hoffman v. BlaskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Norwood v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
500 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.