Legal Opinion
Bokros v. Associates Finance, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided December 6, 1984No. 84 C 6126PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, District Judge.
Csaba Bokros (“Bokros”) charges Associates Finance, Inc. (“Associates”) with violations of the Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1601-rl667e, 1 and various state statutory and common law rules. On Associates’ motion, this Court dismissed Bokros’ original complaint and this action because the limitations periods applicable under TILA (one for rescission and one for damage actions) had run, thus eliminating the sole basis for federal jurisdiction. Bokros then filed an Amended Complaint (the “Complaint”) seeking to meet Associates’…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Bailey v. GloverSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Robert WOLFOLK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Victor M. RIVERA, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Roberson v. Cityscape Corp. (In Re Roberson)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
- Gombosi v. Carteret Mortgage Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
- Bermudez v. First of America Bank Champion, N.A.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994
- Levites v. ChipmanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
- Jankus v. Edge Investors, L.P.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.