Legal Opinion
Jankus v. Edge Investors, L.P.
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided April 8, 2009No. Case 08-80200-CIVPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER PARTIALLY GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT & DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
DANIEL T.K. HURLEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff Richard Jankus (“Jankus”) brings claim under the Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act (ILSA), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1701-1720, and pendent state law claims against Defendant The Edge Investors LP (“The Edge” or “developer”) alleging that The Edge failed to make required disclosures when he purchased a condominium unit. The case is now before the court upon the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment. [DE# 21, 31]
I. Fact Background
The…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Burnett v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Johnson v. Board of Regents of the University of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- Tobye R. Markowitz, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Northeast Land Company. Appeal of Tobye R. MarkowitzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Beach v. Ocwen Federal BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Veneklase v. Bridgewater Condos, L.C.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Plaza Court, L.P. v. Baker-ChaputDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- Venezia v. 12TH & DIVISION PROPERTIES, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2009
- Taplett v. TRG Oasis (Tower Two), Ltd., L.P.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2009
- Stephen Veneklase v. Bridgewater Condos, LCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012