Fox v. Hale & Norcross Silver Mining Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. J. C. B. Heb-bard, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
This appeal is taken by the executors of W. S. Hobart, deceased, and involves the same questions which were presented upon the appeal of Hayward et al. in the same action, No. 15301, recently decided. The cause was tried and finally submitted to the court for its decision May 3, 1892, and on the 26th of May the court filed a written opinion announcing its conclusions, and directing counsel to prepare findings and a decree in accordance with said opinion. Hobart died June 2, 1892, and upon proper proceedings therefor the appellants, Cross and Bridge, who had been appointed the executors of his…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mitchell v. OvermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Campbell v. MesierNew York Court of Chancery · 1819
- Coleman v. WoodworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- In re Estate of PageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
3Cited by38 opinions
- Norton v. City of PomonaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Wikstrom v. Yolo Fliers ClubCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Estate of PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Leavitt v. GibsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- De Leonis v. WalshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.