Legal Opinion

Switzler v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 19, 1930No. Docket No. 4012PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

(For convenience, the plaintiff in this action will be referred to as the “plaintiff,” and the three appellants, simply as “appellants.”)

The plaintiff had judgment against the appellants in an action prosecuted by her against the appellants and the defendant Leo F. Sweem, to recover damages suffered by reason of a collision between an automobile driven by the defendant Leo F. Sweem, and an engine drawing a train of cars belonging to the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, and operated by J. J. Scott, as engineer, and 0. A. Parks, as fireman.

The complaint alleges that the automobile…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Pacific Telephone Etc. Co. v. EshlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Civic Center Ass'n of Los Angeles v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Crabbe v. Mammoth Channel Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Koster v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Mullery v. Great Northern Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1915

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ChadwickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Hamilton v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Lebak v. NelsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Martindale v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Raliway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Wright v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1939

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API