Legal Opinion
In re Dobson
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 9, 1995No. 93-BG-651PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
Before us in a reciprocal disciplinary proceeding is a recommendation by the Board on Professional Responsibility that respondent be suspended for two years, with a requirement of a showing of fitness prior to reinstatement. D.C.Bar R. XI, §§ 11, 16. The Board made this recommendation after determining that the sanction of a six-month suspension with a like requirement of a showing of fitness, imposed by the Supreme Coui’t of Minnesota on July 12, 1991, was “substantially different discipline” than *872would be warranted in the District of Columbia for the underlying conduct. D.C.Bar R. XI, §…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re SlosbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- In Re GarnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Matter of AlexanderDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- In Re LenoirDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- In Re DruryDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re SteinbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- In re GlascoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- In re the Virgin Islands Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2014