Legal Opinion
In Re Lenoir
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 17, 1991No. 90-672PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Per curiam
This matter is before us for our consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility concerning respondent Barry Lenoir. Lenoir has not contested the Board’s recommendation to this court that he be suspended from practice for eighteen months and required to show fitness for practice before reinstatement.
The Board found that Lenoir violated seven separate disciplinary rules involving three different clients, Mrs. Alberta Pryor, Ms. Sarah Holley, and Mr. Maryland Banner: DR 6-101(A)(3) (neglect) (Pryor, Holley, Banner); DR 9-103(B)(2) (failure to secure…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- In Re RebackDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- In Re HutchinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Matter of HauptDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Matter of ShorterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Matter of SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- In Re GoldsboroughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Jonathan Woodner Co. v. BreedenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- In Re AndersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- In Re SteeleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- In re MartinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.