Legal Opinion
In re Glasco
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 25, 1999No. 97-BG-1453PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
The Board on Professional Responsibility (the Board) recommends that respondent A. George Glaseo, admitted to the Bar of the District of Columbia in June 1975, be disbarred nunc pro tunc to August 12, 1992. The record reflects that this was the date upon which the Supreme Court of California had disbarred him for having been tried and convicted in California of grand theft and related charges.1 The California Supreme Court has since then reinstated the respondent to its bar.
The Board concluded that disbarment is the appropriate sanction in this case because under the circumstances here…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re ZilberbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Matter of GoldbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- In Re GardnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- In re DobsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- In Re MirrerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
3Cited by3 opinions
- IN RE MENACHEM E. LIFSHITZDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
- In re LifshitzDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
- In re RamosDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004