May v. Sommerfield
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSmolensk, J.
Plaintiff appeals as of right from an order summarily disposing of his third-party no-fault claim pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(10). We remand for further proceedings.
Plaintiff, suffered injuries when his car was struck by a pickup truck driven by defendant Matthew A. Sommerfield. Plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in ruling that, although plaintiff suffered an objectively manifested impairment of an important body function, he did not meet the no-fault “threshold” because his impairment does not affect his ability to lead a normal life.
This Court reviews de novo motions for summary…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Maiden v. RozwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Spiek v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
- Quinto v. Cross and Peters Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1996
- DiFranco v. PickardMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
- Heinz v. Chicago Road Investment Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kern v. Blethen-ColuniMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
- Miller v. PurcellMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
- May v. SommerfieldMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
- Kern v. Blethen-ColuniMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
- Kern v. Blethen-ColuniMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000