Legal Opinion

Heinz v. Chicago Road Investment Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 11, 1996No. Docket 169059, 169075PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Per curiam

In Docket No. 169059, plaintiffs appeal from the judgment of the circuit court awarding plaintiffs $70,034.77. The amount awarded represents the jury’s verdict of $198,000, minus worker’s compensation benefits received by Mr. Heinz, and then reduced by fifty percent as a result of plaintiff Robert Heinz’ comparative negligence. Plaintiffs contend that the trial court erred in reducing the jury’s verdict by the amount of the worker’s cpmpensation benefits under MCL 600.6303(1); MSA 27A.6303(1). We disagree and thus affirm the trial court’s decision to reduce the jury’s verdict by the amount of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. People v. StanawayMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Lorencz v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Marquis v. Hartford Accident & IndemnityMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  4. City of Detroit v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Altman v. Meridian TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1992

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. In Re MCI Telecommunications ComplaintMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Dextrom v. Wexford CountyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Zdrojewski v. MurphyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. PT Today, Inc. v. Commissioner of the Office of Financial & Insurance ServicesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Fodale v. Waste Management of Michigan, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API