Legal Opinion
Miller v. Purcell
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided August 23, 2001No. Docket 221473PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Per curiam
Defendant appeals by leave granted from an order of the trial court denying her motion for summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(10). We reverse.
This appeal arises from plaintiffs claim against defendant following an automobile accident at a Saginaw intersection. The complaint alleged that plaintiff suffered injuries to her neck, arms, and back as a result of the accident, and that these injuries amounted to a serious impairment of body function within the meaning of § 3135 of the no-fault act. MCL 500.3135. Defendant moved for summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(10), arguing that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cassidy v. McGovernMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Kern v. Blethen-ColuniMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
- Krohn v. Sedgwick James of Michigan, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
- Stevenson v. ReeseMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
- Burk v. WarrenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Kreiner v. FischerMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
- McManamon v. Redford Charter TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
- Healing Place at North Oakland Medical Center v. Allstate InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
- Campbell v. KovichMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
- Signature Villas, LLC v. City of Ann ArborMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.