Legal Opinion

May v. Sommerfield

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 26, 2000No. Docket 213378PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff appealed as of right from an order summarily disposing of his third-party no-fault claim pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(10). In its written judgment, the trial court found that plaintiff’s injury did not meet the no-fault “threshold” requirement. On appeal, plaintiff contended that the trial court erred in dismissing his claim. We concluded that the trial court erred in granting defendant’s motion for summary disposition without making the findings required under MCL 500.3135(2)(a); MSA 24.13135(2)(a), which provides in pertinent part that the issue whether an injured person has suffered…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. May v. SommerfieldMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kreiner v FischerMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Straub v. ColletteMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Straub v. ColletteMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API