Legal Opinion

Redding v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided December 15, 2011No. Civil Action No. 2010-1811PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

AMY BERMAN JACKSON, District Judge.

Plaintiff brings this action asserting five statutory and common law claims for discrimination and retaliation arising out of her employment as a parking enforcement officer for the defendant District of Columbia. Defendant has moved to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment. [Dkt. # 5]. Because plaintiff failed to bring her common law, Title VII, and Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) claims within the applicable time limits, the Court will grant defendant’s motion for summary judgment.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND 1

Plaintiff…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Greer v. Board of Trustees University of District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  2. Direct Supply, Inc. v. Specialty Hospitals of America, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  3. Thompson v. HSBC Bank, USA, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  4. King v. Barbour, Jr.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  5. Martin v. Piedmont AirlinesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API