Legal Opinion
Martin v. Piedmont Airlines
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 7, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2012-0650PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
AMY BERMAN JACKSON, District Judge.
Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, sues Piedmont Airlines, Station Manager Fred Louden, Human Resources Manager Michelle Foose, and Director of Stations Bob Berg for “discrimination, harassment, civil rights, negligence, retaliation, and violation of [National Labor Relations Act] policies governing protections concerning employees active in union activities.” Compl. at 1. He seeks $4.8 million in damages. Id.
Pending before the court is defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint against the individual defendants under Federal Rule of Civil…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Holland v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- William L. Mondy v. Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- West v. ConrailSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Chung v. U.S. Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Miller v. Downtown D.C. Business Improvement DistrictDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Miller v. Downtown D.C. Business Improvement DistrictDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Mitchell v. Office Depot Inc.District Court, D. Alaska · 2023
- Philips North America LLC v. Summit Imaging IncDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2020
- Williams v. PerdueDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020