Legal Opinion

Thompson v. HSBC Bank, USA, N.A.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 27, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2010-2075PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the motion of defendant, HSBC Bank, USA, N.A., to dismiss the amended complaint of pro se plaintiff Valerie A. Thompson under Rule 8 and Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Upon consideration of the parties’ papers, the relevant legal authorities, and the entire record in this case, the Court will grant HSBC’s motion to dismiss. 1

I. BACKGROUND

Valerie A. Thompson, proceeding pro se, has filed this lawsuit against HSBC Bank USA, N.A. She alleges that HSBC owes her $382,500 plus interest and damages.…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Judith CARTER, Plaintiff, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Et Al., DefendantsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  2. Ford v. SunTrust Mortg.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
  3. Greggs v. Autism Speaks, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  4. Mokhtar v. KerryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
  5. Ojelade v. Unity Health Care, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API