Bassett v. Ryan
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
UDALL, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal by plaintiffs, Joe R. Bassett and Mable Bassett, his wife, from a judgment entered against them based upon a directed verdict for the defendants, and from the order denying their motion for a new trial.
The facts material to this appeal are as follows: Plaintiff Joe Bassett was an experienced cattleman, with many years experience at the time of this sale, and holding like grazing permits and preferences in his own name. The defendants (appellees) were a partnership consisting of E. E. Ryan, J. B. Ryan, and C. M. Ryan, d. b. a. Ryan Cattle Company. In…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Nichols v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1949
- Thornburg v. FryeArizona Supreme Court · 1934
- Red Canyon Sheep Co. v. IckesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
- Tidwell v. RiggsArizona Supreme Court · 1950
- Bell v. Apache Maid Cattle Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Casey v. Beaudry Motor CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1957
- City of Phoenix v. BrownArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- Meloy v. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1951
- Pena v. StewartArizona Supreme Court · 1955
- Ruelas v. RuelasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.