Legal Opinion

Meloy v. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1951No. 5372PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Chief Justice.

There are two sound reasons, neither of them suggested by the appellee, why this court upon its own motion should dismiss this appeal.

The first ground is a jurisdictional one. It is fundamental that the right of appeal exists only by force of the statutes, and where no appeal is afforded, the Supreme Court has no jurisdiction to pass upon the merits of a controversy. State v. Phelps, 67 Ariz. 215, 193 P.2d 921; Duncan v. Superior Court of Pinal County, 65 Ariz. 193, 177 P.2d 374.

In the instant case the notice of appeal is from an order of the superior court granting a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. PhelpsArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Wright v. GibsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
  3. Ingalls v. NeidlingerArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Duncan v. Superior Court of Pinal CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Tidwell v. RiggsArizona Supreme Court · 1950

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. King v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Harris v. Cochise Health SystemsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  3. Allstate Insurance Company v. CookCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
  4. Howard P. Foley Company v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  5. Williams v. Bankers National InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1956

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API