Legal Opinion

Nichols v. City of Phoenix

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1949No. 4956PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Justice.

Separate actions were brought by Nancy W. Nichols (joined by her husband) and Max Latimer against the City of Phcenix and Guy Sheldon, its bus driver employee. The two actions were consolidated and tried before a jury. At the close of all of the evidence the trial court granted a motion for an instructed verdict interposed by these defendants, and judgment was thereupon entered in their favor that the plaintiffs take nothing. Upon denial of their motion for a new trial, the plaintiffs (appellants) have brought the matter before us for review. Both appeals are presented on the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Milwaukee & Saint Paul Railway Co. v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. McEvoy v. American Pool Corp.California Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Morrison v. ActonArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Arizona Binghampton Copper Co. v. DicksonArizona Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'n v. CornumArizona Supreme Court · 1937

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Liberty National Life Insurance Company v. WeldonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  2. Ginés Meléndez v. Autoridad de Acueductos y Alcantarillados de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1962
  3. McClinton v. RiceArizona Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Southern Pacific Railroad Co. v. MitchellArizona Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Figueroa v. MajorsArizona Supreme Court · 1959

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API