Legal Opinion

Tidwell v. Riggs

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1950No. 5185PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Justice.

Appellant, Ireta Blake Tidwell, hereinafter called plaintiff, brought an action for conversion against all of the defendants-appellees named in the foregoing title. She alleged that the defendants had converted to their own use 196 tons of hay purchased by her from defendants Riggses and that as a result she had been damaged to the extent of $4312. The case was tried to a jury and a verdict rendered in favor of all the defendants and against the plaintiff. However, Ben Riggs and Myrtle Riggs, his wife, were the only defendants who had a judgment entered in their favor on the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Thornburg v. FryeArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Collins v. CollinsArizona Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Miller v. KearnesArizona Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Garlington v. McLaughlinArizona Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Merryman v. SearsArizona Supreme Court · 1937

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. HollisArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Meloy v. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Bean v. GorbyArizona Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Armstrong v. ArmstrongArizona Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Bragg v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1950

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API