Tidwell v. Riggs
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
UDALL, Justice.
Appellant, Ireta Blake Tidwell, hereinafter called plaintiff, brought an action for conversion against all of the defendants-appellees named in the foregoing title. She alleged that the defendants had converted to their own use 196 tons of hay purchased by her from defendants Riggses and that as a result she had been damaged to the extent of $4312. The case was tried to a jury and a verdict rendered in favor of all the defendants and against the plaintiff. However, Ben Riggs and Myrtle Riggs, his wife, were the only defendants who had a judgment entered in their favor on the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Thornburg v. FryeArizona Supreme Court · 1934
- Collins v. CollinsArizona Supreme Court · 1935
- Miller v. KearnesArizona Supreme Court · 1935
- Garlington v. McLaughlinArizona Supreme Court · 1940
- Merryman v. SearsArizona Supreme Court · 1937
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. HollisArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Meloy v. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1951
- Bean v. GorbyArizona Supreme Court · 1956
- Armstrong v. ArmstrongArizona Supreme Court · 1951
- Bragg v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1950
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.