Legal Opinion

Pena v. Stewart

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1955No. 5878PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered on a directed verdict at the close of plaintiffs’ case in favor of all the above-named defendants on the ground that plaintiffs had failed to present a prima facie case of negligence against any of said defendants. Plaintiffs by appropriate assignments of error, supported by several propositions of law, challenge the correctness of the court’s evaluation of the evidence and its ruling that they had failed to submit sufficient proof to entitle them to have the cause submitted to the jury for its determination of the issues.

Admittedly…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. New York Life Insurance v. McNeelyArizona Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Nichols v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Stewart v. Crystal Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Crouse v. Wilbur-Ellis Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Owl Drug Co. v. CrandallArizona Supreme Court · 1938

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cummings v. PraterArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Davidson v. WeeArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Presson v. Mountain States Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  4. Bickham v. REYNOLDS ET UXOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Avechuco v. AwtreyArizona Supreme Court · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API