Legal Opinion

Mutual of Enumclaw Life Insurance v. Lincoln

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1997No. 22908PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Justice.

This is an automobile liability insurance case. We conclude that there is no ambiguity concerning the liability limits for bodily injury contained in the insurance policy and that the limit for bodily injury to each person injured in an accident is $100,000.

I

THE BACKGROUND AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS

Douglas Lincoln (Lincoln) was involved in an automobile accident when he lost control of his vehicle on an icy road. Lincoln’s vehicle crossed the centerline and struck a vehicle occupied by Vonda and Louis Teply and their daughter, Sondra Bryant, (the Teplys). The Teplys sued Lincoln…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bondy v. LevyIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  2. City of Boise v. Planet InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. RobertsIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Teply v. LincolnIdaho Court of Appeals · 1994

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lovey v. Régence BlueShield of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Martinez v. Idaho Counties Reciprocal Management ProgramIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Potlatch Grain & Seed v. Millers Mutual Fire InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Martinez v. Idaho Counties Reciprocal Management ProgramIdaho Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API