Legal Opinion
Martinez v. Idaho Counties Reciprocal Management Program
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided April 28, 2000No. 23981Published
1Opinion of the Court
999 P.2d 902 (2000)
134 Idaho 247
Daniel Asevedo MARTINEZ, Jr. and Nancy Martinez, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
IDAHO COUNTIES RECIPROCAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM ("ICRMP"), a reciprocal company domiciled in Boise, Idaho and its producer James D. Dickinson Insurance, Inc. d/b/a Dickinson Insurance and Financial Services, Defendants-Respondents.
No. 23981.
Supreme Court of Idaho, Coeur d'Alene, April 1999 Term.
April 28, 2000.
Rehearing Denied April 28, 2000.
Harvey Richman, Coeur d'Alene, for appellants.
Hamlin & Sasser, P.A., Boise, for respondent ICRMP. Geoffrey M. Wardle argued.
Elam &…
Also in this document: Dissent; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bonz v. SudweeksIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
- Miller v. HallerIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
- McKay v. OwensIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
- Bonner County v. Panhandle Rodeo Ass'n, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1980
- City of Boise v. Planet InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.