Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. Roberts
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
TROUT, Justice.
This is an insurance coverage case in which the insurer sought a judicial declaration that, under a homeowner’s insurance policy, it was neither obligated to defend the insured nor to cover claims against him arising from injuries sustained by the insured’s son in a swimming pool accident.
I
BACKGROUND
Mutual of Enumclaw (Mutual) issued a homeowner’s insurance policy (Policy) on January 19, 1991, listing the “Named Insured” as “David M & Denise M Roberts” (David and Denise) and “The Premises Covered By This Policy” as “775 Owyhee, Ada County, Kuna, Idaho 83634.” On the date of the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- G&M Farms v. Funk Irrigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
- Farm Credit Bank of Spokane v. StevensonIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
- Friel v. Boise City Housing AuthorityIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
- Moss v. Mid-American Fire & Marine InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
- McCoy v. LyonsIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Clark v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
- Cascade Auto Glass, Inc. v. IDAHO FARM BUREAU INSURANCE COMPANYIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
- Farmers Ins. Co. of Idaho v. TalbotIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
- Arreguin v. Farmers Ins. Co. of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
- Vaught v. Dairyland InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1998
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.