Legal Opinion

Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. Roberts

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1996No. 21495PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TROUT, Justice.

This is an insurance coverage case in which the insurer sought a judicial declaration that, under a homeowner’s insurance policy, it was neither obligated to defend the insured nor to cover claims against him arising from injuries sustained by the insured’s son in a swimming pool accident.

I

BACKGROUND

Mutual of Enumclaw (Mutual) issued a homeowner’s insurance policy (Policy) on January 19, 1991, listing the “Named Insured” as “David M & Denise M Roberts” (David and Denise) and “The Premises Covered By This Policy” as “775 Owyhee, Ada County, Kuna, Idaho 83634.” On the date of the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. G&M Farms v. Funk Irrigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Farm Credit Bank of Spokane v. StevensonIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Friel v. Boise City Housing AuthorityIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Moss v. Mid-American Fire & Marine InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  5. McCoy v. LyonsIdaho Supreme Court · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Clark v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Cascade Auto Glass, Inc. v. IDAHO FARM BUREAU INSURANCE COMPANYIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Farmers Ins. Co. of Idaho v. TalbotIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Arreguin v. Farmers Ins. Co. of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Vaught v. Dairyland InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1998

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API