Legal Opinion

Lovey v. Régence BlueShield of Idaho

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 2003No. 28949PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EISMANN, Justice.

This is an interlocutory appeal from an order holding that the arbitration clause in an insurance policy is unenforceable. We reverse.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The plaintiff-respondent Peggy Lovey purchased a short-term, non-renewable health insurance policy from defendant-appellant Regence BlueShield of Idaho (BlueShield) providing coverage from August 4, 2000, until December 4, 2000. In November 2000, Ms. Lovey underwent testing to determine whether pain she was experiencing in her legs was due to a vascular condition. BlueShield paid benefits related to those tests.

On…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Seifert v. US Home Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1999

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. P.O. Ventures, Inc. v. Loucks Family Irrevocable TrustIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Jorgensen v. CoppedgeIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Bakker v. Thunder Spring-Wareham, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Howard v. PerryIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Grand Prospect Partners v. Ross Dress for Less, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2015

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API