Potlatch Grain & Seed v. Millers Mutual Fire Insurance
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
EISMANN, Justice.
We affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the insurance policy issued by respondent had expired prior to appellant’s loss.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Beginning in the early 1990’s, the appellant Potlatch Grain and Seed (Potlatch Grain) purchased annual policies of property and casualty insurance from the respondent Millers Mutual Fire Insurance Company (Millers). In July 1997, Potlatch Grain renewed its insurance policy with Millers for a one-year term ending July 29, 1998. Millers renewed that policy through…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Infanger v. City of SalmonIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. HartIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
- Van Brunt v. StoddardIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
- Ahles v. TaborIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
- Nordstrom v. GuindonIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Markel International Ins. Co. v. Jason Ezra EreksonIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
- Markel International Ins. Co. v. Jason Ezra EreksonIdaho Supreme Court · 2012