Legal Opinion

Bullis Charter School v. Los Altos School District

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 27, 2011No. H035195PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DUFFY, J.

The Legislature in 1992 enacted the Charter Schools Act of 1992 (Ed. Code, § 47600 et seq.; the Act).1 Eight years later, the California electorate amended the Act by adopting Proposition 39. Under that amendment, school districts must provide to charter schools established within their jurisdiction school facilities with “conditions reasonably equivalent to those in which the [charter school] students would be accommodated if they were attending other public schools of the district.” (§ 47614, subd. (b).) This case explores the practical meaning of this reasonable equivalence…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Harris v. Capital Growth Investors XIVCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Vons Companies, Inc. v. Seabest Foods, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Western States Petroleum Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Martinez v. CombsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  5. In Re William M.California Supreme Court · 1970

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. 569 East County Boulevard LLC v. Backcountry Against the Dump, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. Building a Better Redondo, Inc. v. City of Redondo BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. Los Angeles International Charter High School v. Los Angeles Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. California Charter Schools Ass'n v. Los Angeles Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Hudson v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API