Legal Opinion
California Charter Schools Ass'n v. Los Angeles Unified School District
California Supreme Court
Decided April 9, 2015No. S208611PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LIU, J.
In 2000, California voters enacted Proposition 39, which requires school districts to share their facilities with charter schools so that charter school students have access to facilities “reasonably equivalent” to those available to other public school students. (Ed. Code, § 47614, subd. (b), as amended by Prop. 39, as approved by voters, Gen. Elec. (Nov. 7, 2000).) In 2002, the State Board of Education (Board) issued regulations on how to implement this requirement. For more than a decade, the Board’s regulations and the underlying mandate of Proposition 39 have been the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Selby Realty Co. v. City of San BuenaventuraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Pacific Legal Foundation v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Simpson Strong-Tie Co., Inc. v. GoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- People v. HarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- Environmental Charter High School v. Centinela Valley Union High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Cleveland Nat'l Forest Found. v. San Diego Ass'n of GovernmentsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- Doe v. Roman Catholic Archbishop etc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
- A.J. Fistes Corp. v. GDL Best Contractors, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- San Jose Unified School District v. Santa Clara County Office of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Westchester Secondary Charter School v. Los Angeles Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.