Mitchell v. Mitchell
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtShaep, J.
A contract between husband and wife whereby he agrees to pay specified sums for her support may not be enforced by contempt proceedings even though the agreement has the sanction and approval of the court. Holden v. Holden, 245 N.C. 1, 95 S.E. 2d 118; Stanley v. Stanley, 226 N.C. 129, 37 S.E. 2d 118; Brown v. Brown, 224 N.C. 556, 31 S.E. 2d 529. When, however, a court having jurisdiction of the parties and the cause of action adjudges and orders the husband to make specified payments to his wife for her support, his wilful failure to comply with the court’s judgment will subject him to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bunn v. BunnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Gloth v. GlothSupreme Court of Virginia · 1930
- Holden v. HoldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Stanley v. . StanleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Edmundson v. EdmundsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Walters v. WaltersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- McCarley v. McCarleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Henderson v. HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- Britt v. BrittCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Hamilton v. HamiltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.