Legal Opinion

Bunn v. Bunn

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 20, 1964No. 454PublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShabp, J.

“Alimony, as that term is used in the law, is an allowance made for the support of the wife out of the estate of the husband by order of court in an appropriate proceeding, and is either temporary or permanent.” Stanley v. Stanley, 226 N.C. 129, 37 S.E. 2d 118. Consent judgments for the payment of subsistence to the wife are of two kinds. In one, the court merely approves or sanctions the payments which the husband has agreed to make for the wife’s support and sets them out in a judgment against him. Such a judgment constitutes nothing more than a contract between the parties made with the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Fuchs v. FuchsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. Briggs v. BriggsOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Holden v. HoldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  4. Keen v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Keen v. . ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. Francis v. FrancisTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  2. White v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. State v. LampkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  4. Hudson v. HudsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  5. Walters v. WaltersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API